How do we best measure the impact of fact-checking?
View this email in your browser

Fact-checking politicians: Does it work?

"Once the dust settles on this notably mendacious
and polarized election, one unlikely winner
will emerge: the fact-checker."

Tonight’s presidential debate is sure to drive yet more eyeballs to the various websites now devoted to around-the-clock political fact-checking.

While catching someone in a lie (or even a half-truth) may provide plenty of fodder for social media, linking audience spikes to success may not be best metric to judge this emerging practice.

In our Analysis section, Research and Strategy Director Jessica Clark walks us through four key considerations when evaluating the effectiveness of fact-checking.

Read more
 Plus, don't miss:
  • A recent study in our Research section finds that the decline of traditional media feeds into polarization and threatens "information impoverishment" for all.
  • In our Tools section, check out this tutorial we created to help you maximize the data in our new map, "Foundation Maps for Media Funding."
  • By 2020, 41.6 million U.S. consumers are expected to be mobile-only—no laptop, no desktop. Read more about the rise of mobile media in our Articles section.

Got a tip? Drop us a line.
Media Impact Funders
Did you receive this email from a friend?
Sign up for our newsletter.


Our Mailing Address:
200 West Washington Square, Suite 220
Philadelphia, PA 19106

Update your preferences